The term “Divisive political viewpoints” refers to books challenging or questioning the status quo or offering viewpoints that some people consider controversial or offensive. These books may deal with issues such as race, gender, sexuality, religion, or politics.

Some examples of books that have been challenged for divisive political viewpoints include:

• To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee: This classic novel deals with racism in the American South.
• The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie: This novel tells the story of a Native American boy who leaves his reservation to attend a white school.
• The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas: This novel tells the story of a black teenager who witnesses the police shooting of her unarmed friend.
• Maus by Art Spiegelman: This graphic novel tells the story of the author’s father’s experience as a Holocaust survivor.
• Beloved by Toni Morrison: This novel tells the story of a former slave who kills her own child to save her from slavery.

Books that challenge political viewpoints can be controversial because they can make people feel uncomfortable or challenged. They can also be seen as promoting a particular ideology or viewpoint.

Note that not everyone agrees with the challenges to books with divisive political viewpoints. Some people believe these books are important because they offer different perspectives and challenge the status quo. Others believe that these books are harmful because they can promote hatred or violence.

The debate over books with divisive political viewpoints is a complex one. There are many factors to consider, including the right to free speech, the importance of challenging ideas, and the potential harm that these books can cause.

Ultimately, it is up to each individual library to decide whether to remove a book from its shelves. Libraries should consider the reasons for the challenge, the potential harm that the book could cause, and the right to free speech when making this decision.